January 28, 2009
With crisis comes opportunity. I’ve been reading a number of articles recently on the rise of risk management as an area of critical focus within organizations, after a period when some had lamented a reduced emphasis on the discipline.
From the number of associations representing risk management professionals, there’s no shortage of types of risk being managed, from financial and business risk to specializations such as public sector or public health risk.
I was struck this week by the growing use of “risk management” as a marketing term. Take any word and insert “risk management,” “risk analysis” or “risk assessment” after that word and you have a new way of marketing your practice specialties. For example: financial, credit, insurance, human resources, health insurance, information, information systems, investment and reputation risk management have all crossed my path as areas of expertise tied to risk analysis services in the past week.
A sales call offering an “equipment risk analysis” to save OSCPA money on facility utility expenses drew my attention to the high leveraging of this term as businesses take a hard look at controlling costs in the current economy.
At least one accounting/consulting firm’s marketing department has tuned into increased interest in risk – a search for “risk management” attached to various terms above on one of my favorite business news sites returned a number of different bios from that site’s user community. Each was from the same firm identifying an individual who specializes in that area of practice – a great way to make use of online networking to promote their business.
How can you best manage this opportunity? While written before the full impact of the credit crisis was known, a Fast Company article from December 2007 provides tips that are still relevant today on “How to Help Your Company Focus on the New World of Risk”.
Stealing a quote from an interview with Ron Dembo, CEO of Algorithmics Inc., “If you’re not managing risk, you can’t claim to be managing your business.” CPAs specialize in helping companies make sense of a changing and complex world. Stepping up our skills in risk management is a critical part of focusing on that future.
Leave a Comment » |
Workplace | Tagged: Risk Analysis, Risk Assessment, Risk Management |
Permalink
Posted by Laura Hay, CPA, CAE
January 16, 2009
Audience members at the December meeting of the Accountancy Board of Ohio got to hear first-hand the priorities of guests Tom Sadler, Chairman of the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA,) and David Costello, NASBA’s Executive Director.
Topping Sadler’s list is peer review – obtaining peer review as a statutory requirement in states that don’t have it, and achieving state board oversight in states that do (Ohio already has statutory peer review and state board oversight). NASBA also aims to look “under the curtain” for reviews administered at the national level, which have no state board oversight, including achieving an oversight process for desk reviews conducted at AICPA to “ensure independence and that peer review is truly a public interest process.” Sadler noted that he was pleased with AICPA and state society cooperation toward this objective.
This priority was followed by the “Four E’s”:
- Exam – Renegotiating the contract for the computerized CPA exam, and addressing international candidacy for the CPA exam
- Education – Protecting the 150-hour requirement to sit for the exam
- Ethics – Is there opportunity for convergence in state ethics requirements and the AICPA code of professional conduct?
- Enforcement – As governmental agencies increasingly refer cases to the AICPA, how can these be transitioned to state board enforcement?
Sadler commended Ohio’s reputation for enforcement, but noted that nationwide, “we will not be disrespected.”
Costello spoke to state boards’ response to the prospect of international standard-setting, noting that NASBA had concerns at this time about committing state boards to everything promulgated by international standard-setters. A committee had been formed to address implications of global strategies, including international standard-setting, international candidacy for the CPA exam, and convergence of ethics requirements.
A controversial issue within the profession has been movement by some states to allow candidates to sit for the exam with 120 hours of education, but still requiring 150 hours for state licensure. NASBA research finds no detriment in passing rates for sitting at 120 hours, but the topic will be discussed in 2009 regional meetings.
Contrary to NASBA’s views, proponents of retaining the 150-hour requirement to sit for the exam criticize the 120/150 model for chipping away at the intent of the original 150-hour legislation, and communicating the wrong message to the public about the level of education and preparation required to become a CPA. Some critics also question the validity of the NASBA research.
Costello again commended Ohio as a leader in adopting model accountancy law, particularly in the area of mobility for CPAs practicing in multiple states.
Leave a Comment » |
Education | Tagged: Accountancy Board of Ohio, AICPA, CPA exam, NASBA, National Association of State Boards of Accountancy |
Permalink
Posted by Laura Hay, CPA, CAE